Federal judge affirms San Fran's confiscatory magazine ban
Home » Legislation » Gun Control » Federal judge affirms San Fran’s confiscatory magazine ban

Federal judge affirms San Fran’s confiscatory magazine ban

Violation of the city ordinance is a misdemeanor charge

Federal judge affirms San Fran’s confiscatory magazine ban

2/21/14 | by Chris Eger

A federal judge, in response to a lawsuit brought by a veterans police association, sided with San Francisco, affirming the city’s 2013 retroactive ban on magazines that hold more than 10 rounds.

The suit, brought by the San Francisco Veteran Police Officers Association (SFPOA) and supported by the NRA,  challenged the city’s ban on ‘large capacity magazines’ to include even those considered ‘pre-ban’ under state law.

U.S. District Judge William Alsup, a Clinton-era appointment to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, ruled against the injunction filed by SFPOA and the NRA Wednesday.

The San Francisco ordinance, “prevents mass murderers from firing a larger number of rounds faster by depriving them of magazines with the capacity to accept more than 10 rounds,” Alsup wrote in his decision (pdf). If a murderer has to take the time to reload, he said, “there is a better chance that someone will subdue him or her sooner.”

This assertion by Judge Alsup has been disputed in a recent study by criminologist Professor James Fox, who found that: “The overwhelming majority of mass murderers use firearms that would not be restricted by an assault weapons ban.”  With just 14 of 93 mass shootings involving a firearm that used a magazine with a capacity of more than 10-rounds.

“On balance, more innocent lives will be saved by limiting the capacity of magazines than by allowing the previous regime of no limitation to continue,” Alsup said, after citing that fewer than ten rounds are used in most self-defense encounters.

The ban draws its strength from a city ordinance that was voted into place by the San Francisco Board of Supervisors unanimously last October. It requires any person or entity, who otherwise legally possessed a detachable magazine capable of holding more than ten rounds to either (a) remove it from the city, (b) surrender it to the SFPD, or (c) sell or transfer it. The very few exceptions (pdf) are for film props, armored car companies, police, museums (who could only keep unloaded magazines) and gunsmiths.

Violation of the city ordinance is a misdemeanor charge.

via Federal judge affirms San Fran’s confiscatory magazine ban.

Be Sociable, Share!

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

http://ad4.liverail.com/?LR_PUBLISHER_ID=26258&LR_SCHEMA=vast2-vpaid&LR_VERTICAL=preroll&LR_URL=[page_url_macro]&LR_AUTOPLAY=0&LR_CONTENT=6&LR_MUTED=0&LR_VIDEO_ID=[player_videoid_macro]&LR_TITLE=[video_title_macro]