1/17/14 | by Chris Eger
A recently completed study at Northeastern University finds that many of the ‘facts’ circulated by gun control groups about mass shootings in the US are far from it. In fact, the study contends that mass murders rarely use ‘assault weapons,’ cannot be prevented with background checks and gun bans, and that the rates of these shootings as well as their toll is not increasing.
The 22 page study, entitled Mass Shootings in America: Moving Beyond Newtown was compiled by criminology professor James Alan Fox and Monica J. DeLateur. In the study, the two smash a number of gun myths through hard statistical work. Without taking funds from either side in the argument, the work is impartial.
Addressing the popular myth that mass murderers ‘snap and kill indiscriminately’, the study contends that many recent events are very carefully planned out far in advance. Further, instead of being without motivation, five specific causes are mentioned with revenge being ‘by far, the most commonplace’.
“Mass murderers often see themselves as victims—victims of injustice (They seek payback for what they perceive to be unfair treatment by targeting those they hold responsible for their misfortunes.” The study elaborates.
Tackling the subject of violent video games being linked to mass murders in recent years, the study brings into question the fact of whether these individuals were drawn to the game or abandoned to it by an ever-weaker fabric in today’s family structure.
“To the extent that youngsters spend endless hours being entertained by violence says more about the lack of parental supervision and control. It isn’t that the entertainment media are so powerful; it is that our other institutions—family, school, religion, and neighborhood—have grown weaker with respect to socializing children.”